{the Battlefield}

A good Rogue won't lose to a Prottion Paladin. It's very easy to just keep moving bk and forth to and from the Paladin and getting the openers again and again until he is dead. A rogue that just stands there and tries to go toe to toe with the Paladin, yeah, he'll die from the Shieldharges.
A bad rogue will outright lose to a prot pally. Holy shield alone will likely do more damage than the rogue does. A good one though.. It's usually a stupidly long battle with no winner. You do very little damage, he bleeds you, you stun or bubble to heal. Repeat for 10 minutes.

Eks wrote:
Prot Pally is a LOT better in PvP than it was before the pah. We still have 0 resiliee unless we mix gear as another er stated, but we put out a lot more damage than we used to and and have even better ability to survive. The best way to beat a Prot Paladin is to drain his mana any way youan. Rogues used to be the bane of the Prot Paladin, but now if they have equal gear it is a fair fight sie the Paladinan get out of stunlks pretty easily with several different trks now. Warlks are still tough, and shadow priests and huntersan be annoying, though they are beatable.
jeromesimina wrote:Rogues used to be the bane of the Prot Paladin I never PvPd mh with my Paladin, but I think I missed something in thislaim. My Paladin (as Prot) is the onlyharter I've never had issues with a Rogue. Ever. And I'm not just talking about random greenlad Rogues, I mean Arena geared Rogues too. Yea, stupidly long and meaningless fights, but I never had any real issues (hey, I'm Prot, it would have been stupidly long anyway =). Justurious if Rogues beating Prot Palys really was the norm and I somehow was exempt lol, or what Sie the pah and new abilities though, I haven't reallyome ross any Rogues at all, so I'murious about something: just how bad is their new Dismantle ability for usWarriors? I've heard various people, even Rogues,omplaining that it's stupidly OP, but Ian'tomment personally as I've not eountered it yet.