Subscribe to the BlogI don't dislike the turtle skins but the only type I ever consider as a pet are the white ones found on Shimmering Flats (among other places). The others just don't specifically appeal to me. I've stayed away from them at higher levels because of how high their backs are. So, maybe some flatter ones would be nice.
I've never really liked worg skins - any of them. They just look so goofy and top-heavy. And their fangs remind me of monster drawings that ten year olds do, trying to make a beast scary or mean by giving them giant teeth that don't fit the mouth and would keep them from ever being able to close their mouths or chew.
Bears... The fat ass, slack-jawed grumpy pants of Azeroth. Nuff said.
Dragonhawks just look like festive Chinese kites to me, rather than an actual animal. Why not just call them Decrepit Stick-Wings?
- Rorschach wrote:For my own part, regret nothing. Have lived life, free from compromise ... and step into the shadow now without complaint.
Mazra wrote:Words like 'thee' and 'thou'. Sometimes you miss them. Now it's all "Hell naw, I ain't seen nuttin' mayn."
I find Blizzard?? choices for pet skins interesting. For example, I don?? have a snake pet because I don?? care for the graphic. But if Blizzard allowed us to tame shadow serpents I might well take a snake pet for one of my hunters. I like those graphics.
Another example is turtle pets. I like turtles in real life. But I don?? like how they look in game. But if we could have turtle pets that look like the turtle mount I?? head out as soon as possible to tame one.
Anyone else have a pet selection they would go for if Blizzard changed the graphic?
-"Too many requests! Slow down!" Yes, thank you, I should take the time to savor the experience of purchasing 37 chicken eggs.
Calabar (50 Hunter) - Farli (27 Minstrel) - Raedan (21 Champion) - Lyndian (23 Guardian) - Bannik (21 Lore-Master)